Crawler and robots access
Evaluates robots.txt for AI search, AI training, site-owner-requested, classic search, and common crawler user agents at the exact submitted path.
Technical AEO readiness
Audit a page before publishing or revising answer-focused content. Find robots and indexing restrictions, inspect the initial HTML, and turn the evidence into a technical fix list. The score describes this checklist, not an answer engine’s ranking system.
Put the report to work
Use this sequence for one page, then repeat it for another page type.
Google’s AI search features need no special AI text file or special schema. Its normal search requirements still apply. See Google’s guidance on AI features and our scope and scoring explanation.
Included checks
Use the findings to decide which page or discovery-file changes to make first.
Evaluates robots.txt for AI search, AI training, site-owner-requested, classic search, and common crawler user agents at the exact submitted path.
Checks HTTP status, redirects, meta robots, X-Robots-Tag, canonical URL, title, H1, and readable static HTML.
Parses JSON-LD syntax and document shape, discovers robots.txt sitemap declarations, and estimates readable HTML text. Optional llms files and absent JSON-LD do not reduce the score.
Methodology
Review the observed signals and check details before changing your site.
The checklist average is 100 for pass, 55 for warn, 35 for unknown, and 0 for fail, excluding unscored checks. It is a prioritization aid, not a model of Google or other platforms’ eligibility.
Every recommendation is tied to a visible status, header, meta tag, robots.txt rule, missing file, or extracted content signal.
The scanner checks public URLs only and limits long, oversized, or repeated requests so the report stays focused.
Related tools
Check a specific bot policy or explore another part of your page’s search readiness.
FAQ
Short answers for searchers, site owners, and technical SEO teams comparing AI readiness tools.
An AEO checker audits technical signals that can help answer engines discover, understand, and cite a page. This tool focuses on public readiness signals rather than speculative AI ranking claims.
It checks robots.txt, AI bot access, HTTP status, redirects, canonical URL, meta robots, X-Robots-Tag, title, H1, readable HTML, JSON-LD, sitemap.xml, llms.txt, and llms-full.txt.
No. Passing only describes the checks completed here. It does not verify Google indexing, actual bot access through your firewall, content quality, or selection for an AI answer.
Yes for a first technical proof report. It highlights clear technical fixes before a team moves into deeper visibility measurement.